WHO EXACTLY ARE YOU CALLING FAKE?
September 4th, 2026
by CHIC GEEK
Acting differently around different people isn’t proof of a fake personality. The better question is much simpler: what, exactly, are they presenting as true that isn’t?
I’ve had people look at me like they’ve just uncovered a small fraud because I behaved differently around somebody else.
And sometimes, fair.
Even I have come home and thought, Why the hell was I like that?
Because around some people, I am bubbly enough to become mildly exhausting. Around others, I get quieter. More observant. Put me somewhere I feel even slightly judged and suddenly I’m studying everybody like there will be a written exam afterward.
Sometimes I know I’m doing it.
Sometimes I don’t.
Which is probably why, whenever I hear someone say, “She’s completely different around different people. She’s fake,” I always get stuck on the same part.
Fake how?
No, really.
What are we claiming is false?
Because I think fake has become one of those words people throw around when what they actually mean is:
“I saw a version of her I didn’t know existed, and I don’t know what to do with that information.”
You know the feeling.
You’ve known someone for years. Around you, she’s funny, but never that funny. Maybe a little reserved. Then one evening you see her with another group and suddenly she’s throwing her head back laughing like somebody has put on the funniest episode of Friends. She’s touching everyone’s arm. Telling stories you’ve never heard.
Apparently she dances now.
And you’re standing there thinking, Girl. We have partied together. Where was all this?
I understand the shock.
What I don’t understand is how quickly we go from I’ve never seen this to therefore this isn’t real.
Those are not the same thing.
And psychology, rather inconveniently for a good character assassination, has been making essentially the same point for decades. Personality researchers Walter Mischel and Yuichi Shoda described recognizable if-this-then-that patterns: different situations can bring out different behavioral patterns while still belonging to the same underlying personality system.¹ Real-world personality research has since found that who people are with, where they are and what they are doing can also be related to how personality states show up in daily life.²
Which is a very academic way of saying:
Your mother, your boyfriend and your best friend may all know you very well and still sound like they’re describing three different women.
Because some people make you louder.
Some make you softer.
Some make confidence ridiculously easy. Others can make an insecurity you thought had retired come back with full benefits.
And sometimes nothing psychologically profound is happening at all.
Sometimes I am simply reading the room.
I’m obviously not going to behave with someone interviewing me exactly as I behave with the friend who has photographic evidence of my worst decisions.
That isn’t fake.
That is having a functioning understanding of context.
Otherwise etiquette is basically identity fraud with better cutlery.
So by this point, I had almost talked myself into a very convenient conclusion:
Fine. Maybe nobody is fake. Maybe we’re all just “contextual.”
Cute.
Obviously not.
There is a point where adapting stops being expression and starts becoming invention.
Say I genuinely enjoy hiking. I barely go, but when I do, I love it. Then I meet someone outdoorsy and suddenly that part of me gets more airtime.
Fine.
Now say I hate hiking. Always have. Went twice under protest. But the man in front of me is gorgeous and owns trekking poles, so five minutes later I’m saying, “Oh my God, I’m such an outdoors girl.”
Sweetheart.
That is not another side of me coming out.
I have begun writing fiction.
And that is the line.
Expressing something that genuinely exists in you is one thing.
Manufacturing something because you want another person to believe it exists is another.
Which is why even ugly behavior doesn’t automatically equal fake behavior.
You can be warm to my face and bitch about me later.
I may hate that about you. I may decide I never want to see you again. But both behaviors can still genuinely belong to you. You can possess warmth and a remarkable talent for being awful.
The falseness begins when you use that warmth to establish:
I’m loyal to you.
I would never speak about you like that.
You know how much I care about you.
while knowing perfectly well that the reality between us says otherwise.
There.
Now I can identify the lie.
And perhaps that is why
Owning an ugly truth can be more authentic than performing a beautiful one.
Tell me you can be jealous.
Tell me you become opportunistic sometimes.
Tell me you can be vicious when you’re hurt.
Am I impressed? No.
But at least I’m meeting you, not the press release.
Which brings me back to that woman at the party.
Maybe she really was performing.
Maybe she wasn’t.
Maybe the loudness, the affection, the ridiculous laugh—all of it genuinely belongs to her.
And maybe the part that hurts isn’t discovering that she has another personality.
Maybe it is discovering that your relationship with her does not bring that version out.
I know.
Rude.
I preferred the investigation when she was the suspect too.
But that is exactly why I think the word fake deserves a little more interrogation before we throw it at someone.
What is the lie?
Not what changed.
Not what surprised me.
Not which version of them I happened to know.
What are they actually presenting as true that isn’t?
If I can’t identify that, I haven’t proved they’re fake.
I may have simply mistaken the version of them I had access to for the whole person.
Sources:
Stay In Touch
I’ll send you love letters,
if you let me.
